PrepCatPrepCat
Economy29/09/2026

Off-Budget Financing: Extra-Budgetary Resources and Transparency Concerns

Off-budget financing refers to government expenditure financed through borrowings that do not appear in the Union Budget's fiscal deficit calculations. These borrowings, undertaken by public sector undertakings (PSUs), special purpose vehicles (SPVs), or financial institutions on behalf of the government, fund government schemes but are repaid ultimately from budget resources. The practice gained significant attention when the CAG, 15th Finance Commission, and the IMF flagged the scale and opacity of India's extra-budgetary borrowings.

Off-budget borrowings allow the government to fund schemes and subsidies without showing the full fiscal cost in the official fiscal deficit. Common instruments include borrowings by Food Corporation of India (FCI) from NSSF, National Small Savings Fund loans, and SPV-based infrastructure financing. While such financing can help fund critical public investment, it distorts fiscal transparency, understates the true fiscal deficit, and accumulates contingent liabilities for the government. Finance Minister Sitharaman announced elimination of off-budget borrowings starting 2020-21 Budget, and successive budgets have brought most such borrowings on-budget.

📌 Revision Pointers

  • Off-budget borrowing: Borrowing by PSUs/SPVs used for government schemes; not counted in fiscal deficit.

  • Extra-Budgetary Resources (EBR): Broader term; includes market borrowings of CPSEs backed by Central government guarantee or budgetary support.

  • FCI-NSSF: Food Corporation of India borrowed from the National Small Savings Fund to fund food subsidies; kept off-budget. Amount peaked at ~Rs 3.8 lakh crore.

  • IEBR: Internal and Extra Budgetary Resources; part of capital budget; distinct from EBR.

  • CAG concerns: Inadequate format of EBR statement; incomplete disclosure; potential debt trap.

  • 15th FC: Recommended full disclosure by both Centre and states.

  • On-budgeting: Since 2021-22 Budget, food and fertiliser subsidies have been fully reflected on-budget.

  • State off-budget borrowings: States borrow through State PSUs, power DISCOMs, and special vehicles, not always captured in state fiscal deficit.

Detailed Explanation

1 Mechanisms of Off-Budget Financing

PSU borrowings for government schemes: The government directs a PSU to borrow from the market or from the National Small Savings Fund (NSSF) to fund a government scheme. The PSU's debt does not appear in the Union Budget fiscal deficit since it is the PSU's liability on paper. However, the government provides sovereign guarantee or budgetary support for repayment, making it a de facto government liability.

Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs): SPVs are created to fund specific infrastructure projects off-balance sheet. The government provides equity or guarantees; SPV raises debt. This can be legitimate for commercially viable infrastructure but becomes problematic when used primarily to circumvent fiscal deficit disclosure.

National Small Savings Fund (NSSF) lending: NSSF collects small savings from the public and lends to states and designated entities. FCI's NSSF borrowings, used to fund food subsidy operations, were a major source of off-budget financing. FCI's NSSF loans reached approximately Rs 3.8 lakh crore by 2020.

Fertiliser bonds and oil bonds: In the 2000s, the government issued bonds to fertiliser and oil companies to compensate for under-recovery on subsidised products, deferring the fiscal cost.

2 Scale and Evolution in India

The scale of off-budget borrowings became a major concern by 2018-20. CAG reports pointed out that the Statement of Extra-Budgetary Resources, mandated under FRBM, was incomplete and did not capture all entities. The RBI's annual report on State Finances has similarly flagged rising state-level off-budget liabilities, particularly through DISCOM bailouts and state PSU borrowings.

The Centre's off-budget borrowings peaked at approximately Rs 1.62 lakh crore in 2018-19. Finance Minister Sitharaman in Union Budget 2021-22 announced elimination of off-budget financing and brought food subsidy payments to FCI fully on-budget — a significant transparency improvement.

3 CAG and Finance Commission Concerns

CAG findings: The Comptroller and Auditor General has consistently flagged: (i) the EBR statement in the budget documents is not comprehensive — several entities with central government exposure are excluded; (ii) contingent liabilities (guarantees) are not adequately disclosed and can crystallise into actual liabilities; (iii) off-budget borrowings effectively make the reported fiscal deficit an underestimate of the true fiscal stance.

15th Finance Commission: The FC recommended full and transparent disclosure of all off-budget liabilities — both at the Centre and state levels. It recommended that off-budget borrowings be included in computing fiscal deficit for purposes of assessing compliance with fiscal responsibility targets.

IMF-World Bank assessment: In fiscal transparency assessments, India has been urged to improve accounting of contingent liabilities and bring all government-backed borrowings within the fiscal reporting perimeter.

4 State-Level Off-Budget Financing

States use similar mechanisms: State PSU borrowings backed by state guarantees, DISCOM (power distribution company) debt (restructured under UDAY scheme), and SPV borrowings for urban infrastructure. The RBI has flagged that true state indebtedness may be 2-4% of GSDP higher than reported fiscal deficits when off-budget borrowings are included.

UDAY (Ujjwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana): Rs 2.32 lakh crore of DISCOM debt was brought on-budget in 2015-17, causing a one-time jump in state fiscal deficits. This is an example of transparency improving off-budget liabilities.

Important Concepts

  • Contingent liabilities: Liabilities that arise only if certain events occur (e.g., a guarantee is invoked). Not shown in the fiscal deficit but represent fiscal risk.

  • Sovereign guarantee: Government guarantee on borrowings of a PSU/SPV; converts off-budget borrowing into a potential on-budget liability.

  • NSSF: National Small Savings Fund; collects postal savings and small savings; lends to states and designated entities at concessional rates.

  • Implicit subsidy: When a government entity borrows at lower rates due to sovereign backing, the interest rate subsidy is an implicit off-budget outgo.

  • Debt sustainability: IMF/World Bank assess a government's debt sustainability using the broadest measure of public debt, including off-budget liabilities.

  • UDAY scheme: Taken DISCOM losses on-budget for state governments; example of bringing off-budget liabilities to light.

Current Relevance

Reduced but not eliminated: While the Centre has largely eliminated off-budget borrowings for food and fertiliser subsidies since 2021-22, concerns persist at the state level. Several states have guarantees outstanding that can materialise as liabilities.

PMGKAY and food security: The extension of Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (free food grain scheme) has significantly increased the on-budget food subsidy — a direct result of the transparency push, now fully reflected in fiscal deficit.

Infrastructure financing: The National Infrastructure Pipeline and PM GatiShakti rely partly on PSU borrowings and SPV structures. While largely legitimate, these need robust disclosure frameworks to prevent reversion to opacity.

💭 Conclusion

Off-budget financing, while sometimes used to fund genuine public needs, fundamentally undermines fiscal transparency and the credibility of fiscal responsibility frameworks. India's progress in bringing major off-budget items on-budget since 2021-22 is a welcome step, but structural transparency reforms — comprehensive contingent liability disclosure, inclusion of PSU debt in fiscal reporting, and mandatory audit of EBR statements — are still needed to ensure that reported fiscal deficits accurately reflect the true fiscal position of both the Union and state governments.